歡迎加入

登入中時部落格

帳號:  
密碼:  
驗證:   (請輸入下方文字)
驗證用圖片
 
 
若是還有其它問題,
請e-mail至:888@infotimes.com.tw

王孟源的部落格

事實與邏輯

  • 本格總瀏覽人次-3,366,725
  • 引用-1
  • 迴響-5,728
  • 文章-199
  • 2014-07-22 12:06

【防空】【當前新聞】對MH17事件之分析之二

很巧合的在我登出“對MH17事件之分析”的同時,美國眾議員Ron Paul也寫了一篇對MH17事件的評論文章。他覺得美國急着把這事件的責任賴到普丁的頭上,是不誠實又不公平的。其實為什麼美國全國動員,操弄媒體來打這口水仗是很明顯的:CIA(中央情報局)策劃烏克蘭政變觸動了俄國的戦略底線,促使普丁完全倒向中共;美國平時雖然還得裝模作様做個假道學,既然已經撕破臉,就没有什麼正義或真理的考量,從此美國對俄國的戦略目標只有一個,就是不擇手段要把普丁搞下台。很明顯的例子:顯示一套山毛櫸導彈發射系統正從烏克蘭被轉移到俄羅斯的一段類似視頻是編造的,背景中的公告板顯示視頻是在小鎮克拉諾阿梅斯克城拍攝的,該鎮自5月11日以來一直在烏克蘭政府軍控制之下。

Ron Paul是美國聯邦政府裡唯一一個誠實又有見識的人。當然眾人皆醉我獨醒,讓他成了眾矢之的;一般美國媒體忙著罵他是瘋子還來不及,更别想要登他的文章了,所以他只好開自己的網站。這篇文章如下(我的中文打字很慢,翻譯的工作就交給打字强的讀者了):

 

What the Media Won’t Report About Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17

written by ron paul
sunday july 20, 2014


Just days after the tragic crash of a Malaysian Airlines flight over eastern Ukraine, Western politicians and media joined together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster. It had to be Russia; it had to be Putin, they said. President Obama held a press conference to claim – even before an investigation – that it was pro-Russian rebels in the region who were responsible. His ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, did the same at the UN Security Council – just one day after the crash!
 
While western media outlets rush to repeat government propaganda on the event, there are a few things they will not report.
 
They will not report that the crisis in Ukraine started late last year, when EU and US-supported protesters plotted the overthrow of the elected Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych. Without US-sponsored “regime change,” it is unlikely that hundreds would have been killed in the unrest that followed. Nor would the Malaysian Airlines crash have happened. 
 
The media has reported that the plane must have been shot down by Russian forces or Russian-backed separatists, because the missile that reportedly brought down the plane was Russian made. But they will not report that the Ukrainian government also uses the exact same Russian-made weapons.
 
They will not report that the post-coup government in Kiev has, according to OSCE monitors, killed 250 people in the breakaway Lugansk region since June, including 20 killed as government forces bombed the city center the day after the plane crash! Most of these are civilians and together they roughly equal the number killed in the plane crash. By contrast, Russia has killed no one in Ukraine, and the separatists have struck largely military, not civilian, targets.
 
They will not report that the US has strongly backed the Ukrainian government in these attacks on civilians, which a State Department spokeswoman called “measured and moderate.”
 
They will not report that neither Russia nor the separatists in eastern Ukraine have anything to gain but everything to lose by shooting down a passenger liner full of civilians.
 
They will not report that the Ukrainian government has much to gain by pinning the attack on Russia, and that the Ukrainian prime minister has already expressed his pleasure that Russia is being blamed for the attack.
 
They will not report that the missile that apparently shot down the plane was from a sophisticated surface-to-air missile system that requires a good deal of training that the separatists do not have.
 
They will not report that the separatists in eastern Ukraine have inflicted considerable losses on the Ukrainian government in the week before the plane was downed.
 
They will not report how similar this is to last summer’s US claim that the Assad government in Syria had used poison gas against civilians in Ghouta. Assad was also gaining the upper hand in his struggle with US-backed rebels and the US claimed that the attack came from Syrian government positions. Then, US claims led us to the brink of another war in the Middle East. At the last minute public opposition forced Obama to back down – and we have learned since then that US claims about the gas attack were false.
 
Of course it is entirely possible that the Obama administration and the US media has it right this time, and Russia or the separatists in eastern Ukraine either purposely or inadvertently shot down this aircraft. The real point is, it's very difficult to get accurate information so everybody engages in propaganda. At this point it would be unwise to say the Russians did it, the Ukrainian government did it, or the rebels did it. Is it so hard to simply demand a real investigation?

  • 人氣:4,857
  • 引用:1
  • 迴響:2
  • 作者:王孟源

引用

迴響(2)

# re: 【防空】【當前新聞】對MH17事件之分析之二
馬航在烏克蘭東部發生空難悲劇之後幾天,西方政界及媒體無不藉此災難極盡宣傳之能事,他們總是說,一定是俄國,一定是普丁;歐巴馬總統---甚至在未開始調查之前---召集了新聞發佈會,聲稱該區域親俄的反叛軍要負責。其駐聯合國大使薩曼莎·鮑爾在聯合國安理會亦是如此宣稱---僅就在空難發生之隔日。
當西方媒體紛紛急著就此事廣播著官方的宣傳時,有幾件事情他們卻不報導。
他們不會報導烏克蘭危機始於去年底前,正是歐盟及美國所支持的抗議人士在密謀要推翻民選的維克托·亞努科維奇總統的時候。若沒有美國所援助的「政權變革」,在隨後的動亂中也就不會有數以百計的人命喪生,亦不會有馬航空難的慘劇。
媒體報導該班機一定是被俄國軍方或被俄國所支持的分離分子所擊落的,因為擊中該飛機的導彈是俄國所製造,但他們不會報導說烏克蘭政府亦使用完全同一型號的俄製武器。
他們不會報導說,根據歐安組織所顯示,自六月份以來,政變後的基輔政權已經在鬧脫離的盧甘斯克地區殺害了250人,包括在飛機遇難後隔天政府軍轟炸市中心時所導致的 20人喪生!大多數罹難者是平民,至今的總數大概等於飛機墜毀事故遇害的人數。相較之下,俄國在烏克蘭沒有造成任何人的死亡,而分離主義者所攻擊的目標大多是軍方非平民。
他們不會報導說,是美國堅決地支持烏克蘭政府對平民的襲擊,而國務院女發言人稱為「平等而適度地打擊。」
他們不會報導說,打下一架滿載平民的客機,無論對俄羅斯或者對烏克蘭東部的分離主義分子,不僅不會有任何的好處還會對其造成嚴重的阻撓。
他們不會報導說,若將此事歸咎於俄羅斯的話,烏克蘭政府會收受極大的好處,而烏克蘭總理已經表明很高興俄羅斯因為馬航被擊落而受到輿論的指責。
他們不會報導說,擊落客機的飛彈很明顯地是來自極其複雜的地對空導彈系統,其所須要的訓練量能,是分離主義分子無法具備的。
他們不會報導說,烏克蘭東部的分離主義分子在飛機被擊落之前一個星期,已經對烏克蘭政府造成相當大的損失。
他們不會報導說,這起事件與去年夏天美國所聲稱的,敘利亞阿薩德政府用毒氣攻擊古多平民的那一樁事件有多麼類似。彼時阿薩德在與美國所支持的反叛分子鬥爭中也佔據上風,美國遂聲稱該毒氣襲擊是來自敘利亞政府的陣地。之後,美國的主張幾乎把我們推上另一場中東戰爭。在最後一刻,公眾的反對迫使歐巴馬收斂 - 在那之後我們才知道美國所謂的毒氣襲擊消息根本是子虛烏有。
當然,這一次歐巴馬政府和美國媒體沒有搞錯是完全有可能的,確實是俄羅斯或者是東烏克蘭的分離主義者不論是蓄意或者無意中擊落了這架飛機。真正的重點是,要獲得真確的信息是相當困難的,所以每個參與者都只是道聽塗說地宣傳。就這一點上,急就地去說此事是俄國人所為、是烏克蘭政府所為,或是反叛軍所為都是很不明智的。只單純要真實的調查會是很難嗎?
正是因爲打下民航機,對俄國沒有好處,所以只可能是誤擊。但是英美有宣傳優勢,一旦認錯,必然會被無限上綱,所以俄國只好抵死否認。

這本身是個悲劇,但是始作俑者卻是世界霸主,所以挨駡、受罪的都是他人。畢竟真理只在大炮的射程之内。

留下迴響

    • 帳號/暱稱:
    • E-mail:
    • 個人網頁:
    • 留言標題:
    • 留言內容:


  • (只有登入情況下才能留悄悄話,版主回覆也只有已登入的您才能看見)
    • 驗證碼:

    • (請輸入右方文字)

個人檔案

廣告

最新文章

最新迴響

訂閱

TOP